Breaking the SOUND barrier. Because there is NO you or them.
Through my NTU mentees, a journalist from TODAY came to knew about this project, and approached me to seek my inputs on questions he had about employment for deaf Singaporeans today.
Through my NTU mentees, a journalist from TODAY came to knew about this project, and approached me to seek my inputs on questions he had about employment for deaf Singaporeans today.
It has been several months since I rejoined Young ChangeMakers 2.0 at National Youth Council, as a YCM project curator aka mentor.
I am presently the YCM Project Mentor behind a group of enthusiastic undergraduates from Nanyang Technological University, Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information.
The team is planning a campaign, titled “Breaking the Sound Barrier”, which hopes to help the deaf community in Singapore.
1 out of every 1,000 babies born in Singapore have severe or profound hearing loss, and the team found themselves being drawn to this issue and hence, would like to do something for the deaf Singaporeans.
The main partner of this project, Singapore Association of the Deaf (SADeaf) has served the deaf community for over 61 years. To the team, it has highlighted the problem of deaf Singaporeans having difficulty in searching and getting jobs despite having the same qualifications as others. As such, there is an increasing importance to help create an inclusive workplace environment for the deaf.
The objectives of this 7-month campaign are:
The key message here is; to break employment barriers for deaf Singaporeans – they can be valuable employees and excellent contributors to our workorce.
The deaf are just like you and me.
By supporting and dispensing advice to this project, I am indirectly helping similar Singaporeans like myself. Therefore, I stepped forward to be their mentor, offering help.
Presently the team is carrying out a survey to better understand the current situation.
I will be very grateful if you could help us to spread word about this online survey to people in your network connections, of whom you know who are managers, particularly Human Resource personnel, or anyone involved in the hiring procedures.
Responses are kept 100% confidential, and the information collated will be very helpful to this campaign.
Here is the Breaking the Sound Barrier – Online Survey
I hope you can assist us, in helping this group of Singaporeans, building a more inclusive Singapore.
Thank you very much! 🙂
This took place at a graduation ceremony held at Nanyang Technological University last Friday 29 July 2011 . Particularly for the 2011 graduating cohort of students from the Wee Kim Wee School of Communications and Information. The 14th Graduation Ceremony.
Ms Chong Chiao Sing Trinetta, 23 years old, a major in Public Relations and Communication Research who now works at a government statutory board, have been chosen to deliver a valedictorian speech on stage. At the end of her speech, she congratulated her peers and shockingly added this – > “We f***king made it!!”
Oh my goodness!
She may be someone from the Generation Y, but this is definitely no excuse for her for doing so.
When interviewed by Straits Times paper yesterday, Ms Chong said that she is sorry. She further said that it has never been her intention to sensationalise her speech, or offending anyone in the course of delivering the speech. Looking back, she said she realised it have been inconsiderate to make the remark at the graduation ceremony attended by professors, deans, and parents. She is now concerned about possible repercussions.
NTU Assistant Professor Mark Centite defended her. He said, “If you see the video in context, you will know she wasn’t trying to be offensive. It was an expression of exhilaration.”
Yes I may agree with that but I don’t think it means that we can condone her action. I mean, can’t Ms Chong think of another proper word to substitute the word “f***”????
NTU Associate Professor Cherian George however said that valedictorians have the honour of speaking on behalf of their entire cohort, and the chosen ones usually take this responsibility to their peers very seriously. “We have had amazing speeches in the past. It is a pity that this one grabbed attention for the wrong reasons. It is an occasion shared with family members and the F-word isn’t exactly family-friendly. The incident was not monumental enough to spoil a special occasion, but it was inconsderate.”
——————————
I was a mass commmunications student graduated from Marketing Development Institute of Singapore (MDIS).
I agree to a certain extent that communications students tend to be more expressive, in terms of describing their thoughts or viewpoints. But I have been taught/trained to be always mindful of what I say or behave in public, especially at formal events. Be sensitive. Know who are your audience. Think and pause a while even before you intend to say the word. Use good impressionable words, NOT expletives. I think a good example used is “Change” by US President Obama.
And in addition, as compared to say, 5 years ago, these days there are more people using digital media tools such as digital cameras with filming function/smart phones with video function to “record events” with easy access to upload stuff on cyberspace, not restricting to media personnel. People present at the graduation ceremony may be filming her delivering the valedictorian speech. Ms Chong should have been well-aware of that.
Okay, I am aware that there are some young Singaporeans out there (especially those born in the late 1990s or early 2000s) who might rebut and say “Hey, this is no big deal ok. Why do you people get so worked up over the matter?”
Boys and girls, call me old-fashioned if you want to.
I still hold onto this firm belief today that when we are in front of others, in whatever event settings, we should always think before we say. Use appropriate wordings. Because once the word is out, the act is irreversible. And like it or not, once we sprout out an expletive word in a not-so-proper context, people whom do not know us personally would tend to judge/view us negatively. And it is furthermore our Asian value that most of us have been brought up and been taught by our parents – “Do not use any vulgar language in front of teachers/elders/parents/bosses. It looks bad on you right in front of others.”
Let us also be aware that some people may be quite unforgiving – not willing to change the inital bad first impression they have towards us. These people include potential employers who may have the intention to hire us.
To quote a comment by a good friend of mine pertaining this incident — You don’t have to use F-word to show your excitement. There is a tinge difference between coolness and impoliteness. This brings nothing but shame to your school.
An NTU official spokeperson has also spoken that Ms Chong has already apologised to Chairperson of Wee Kim Wee School of Communications and Information, Associate Professor Benjamin Hill Detender, both in person and in writing.
Lastly on a final ending note, let’s just hope that Ms Chong’s current statutory board employer will not judge her negatively, accept her reason that it was “that moment itself, on impulse, she regrettably used the word to express her emotion.”